Legal Opinion

Permalab-Metalab Equipment Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1972No. Civ. 29446PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Maryland Casualty Company (Maryland), one of the defendants below, became surety on a “Private Contractor’s Bond.” Plaintiff Permalab-Metalab Equipment Corporation (Permalab), a subcontractor, commenced an action against the contractor and Maryland for money claimed due on the job against which Maryland’s bond had been written. It recovered judgment against both defendants for $10,525 with interest. Maryland alone appeals from the judgment.

The basic facts are undisputed.

Maryland’s bond was a recorded “statutory” construction contract bond issued under the provisions and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Firemen's Insurance v. DiskinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Trower v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Kline v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. UlrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Robinson & Wilson, Inc. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. HandleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Honig v. Financial Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Hulsey v. KoehlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API