Legal Opinion
Rahman v. Johanns
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 7, 2007No. Civil Action 06-1283 (JDB)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Fazal Rahman, proceeding pro se, brings this action alleging that he was not selected for two positions at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) because of his race and also challenging the lawfulness of an administrative class action settlement agreement resolving claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., by a broader class of Asian/Pacific American employees against the USDA. Pending before the Court are plaintiffs motion for recusal of the undersigned judge, defendant’s motion to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nurriddin v. BoldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Robinson-Reeder v. American Council on Educ.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Brown v. Aramark Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Bolden v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. NixonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.