Legal Opinion
Bolden v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2008-1012PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, a former employee of the Department of State, alleges that he was the victim of unlawful discrimination and retaliation on the basis of his race and age. He brings suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., against Hillary Clinton in her official capacity as the Secretary of State. This matter now comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bonnette v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Warner v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Johnson v. PerezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Thompson v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.