Legal Opinion

State v. Muller

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1992No. 160-91PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLEE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellee was charged by information with operating a motor vehicle in a public place while intoxicated. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. art. 67011-1 et seq. Appellee filed a pretrial motion to suppress an intoxilyzer breath test result and to strike a paragraph of the state’s information. The trial court granted appellee’s motion and the State timely filed a notice of appeal, pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.Proc. art. 44.01.1 More than eight months after the original notice of appeal was filed, the State filed an amended notice of appeal with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. State v. MorenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. State v. RosenbaumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Faulk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. United States v. William c.wolkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. State v. RieweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. State v. RobertsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Bayless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API