Legal Opinion

United States v. William c.wolk

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1972No. 71-1678PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The Government appeals, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2518(10)(b) and 3731, from the granting of a motion to suppress evidence obtained by virtue of a court authorized wiretap. The principal issue on appeal is whether the failure to timely serve formal inventories of wiretap interceptions as required by 18 U.S.C. § 2518(8)(d) justifies suppression of the evidence derived from a wiretap when the appellees had actual notice of the interceptions and were not prejudiced. We conclude that suppression was not justified and reverse.

On February 18, 1971, by order of the district court,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. LaGorgaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. State v. MullerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. United States v. Glen HermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Gary Savaiano, and Gary McPherson and Bill CrummeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Pamela Jean GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API