United States v. William c.wolk
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The Government appeals, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2518(10)(b) and 3731, from the granting of a motion to suppress evidence obtained by virtue of a court authorized wiretap. The principal issue on appeal is whether the failure to timely serve formal inventories of wiretap interceptions as required by 18 U.S.C. § 2518(8)(d) justifies suppression of the evidence derived from a wiretap when the appellees had actual notice of the interceptions and were not prejudiced. We conclude that suppression was not justified and reverse.
On February 18, 1971, by order of the district court,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. LaGorgaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- State v. MullerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- United States v. Glen HermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Gary Savaiano, and Gary McPherson and Bill CrummeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Pamela Jean GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.