Faulk v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.
Appeals are taken from convictions for riot. V.T.C.A.Penal Code, Sec. 42.02. After finding appellants Faulk and Ferguson guilty of riot by arson, the jury assessed punishment at five years for Faulk and three years for Ferguson. After finding appellant Lawless guilty of riot by criminal mischief, the jury assessed punishment at five years, probated.
In their second ground of error, appellants Faulk and Ferguson challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Specifically, they maintain that the evidence is insufficient to prove that a fire…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cumbie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- State v. DouglasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Ransonette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Ex Parte GrovesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Minton v. FrankTexas Supreme Court · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Bigby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Luquis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Skillern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.