Legal Opinion
Baynham v. State Highway Department of South Carolina
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 27, 1936No. 14347PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabler.
This is an action for damages. The complaint alleged, among other things, that the defendant is authorized by statute to construct and to keep in repair certain highways of the State, among them No. 1, extending from Aiken to Augusta, and No. 25, leading through North Augusta, to and across the Savannah River; that the plaintiff, during or prior to 1914, established a pottery manufacturing plant (a two-story brick building), upon the lowlands lying between the river and the higher lands upon which North Augusta is located, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Faust v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Hine v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Sheriff v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reid v. ReidCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Key Sales Co. v. SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANYDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
- Hinkle v. National Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Los Angeles City High School District v. KitaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Owens v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.