Legal Opinion

Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 18, 1931No. 13095PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an action for damages resulting from the alleged negligent construction of a certain culvert, in the relocation of the highway between Greenville and Spartanburg. The circumstances, from the allegations of the complaint, appear to be as follows:

The plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land between the City of Greenville and the City of Greer, in Greenville County, on which is located a mineral spring, amusement park, and a bottling plant with machinery, appliances, and buildings used in connection therewith. The tract of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Carden v. SpilmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Johnson v. City of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Board of RegentsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API