Legal Opinion

Sheriff v. City of Easley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 6, 1936No. 14202PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

July 25, 1934, respondent commenced his action against appellant; the complaint of respondent as amended, and omitting the formal portions, reading as follows:

“(2) That plaintiff is, and for more than six years has been, the owner in fee simple of all that certain tract of land, containing fifty-four (54) acres, more or less, according to survey and plat made by S. H. Bowen, surveyor, October 5, 1918, situate on or near Brushy Creek, just outside of and near to the City of Easley, being the same land devised to him by his father many…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. Swift & Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  3. State ex rel. Applegate v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Charleston & Western Car. Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  5. Leitzsey v. Columbia Water Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Smith v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. James v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. McKenzie v. CITY OF FLORENCESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  5. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API