Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. National Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 14, 2003No. 25626PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

Appellant (Insurance Company) appeals a jury verdict awarding the Hinkles (respondents) $1,500 actual damages and $280,000.01 punitive damages on their claim of negligent nonrenewal of a homeowner’s insurance policy. 1 Insurance Company argues it was entitled to a directed verdict or to a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) for several different reasons; that the punitive damage award was excessive as a matter of law; and that it was entitled to a new trial because of flaws in the jury charge. We find the trial judge erred in denying the Insurance Company’s directed verdict motion and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Baynham v. State Highway Department of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Jones v. LottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Ecclesiastes Production Ministries v. Outparcel Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Lucas v. RAWL FAMILY LTD. PARTNERSHIPSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Parrish v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API