Hinkle v. National Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones
Appellant (Insurance Company) appeals a jury verdict awarding the Hinkles (respondents) $1,500 actual damages and $280,000.01 punitive damages on their claim of negligent nonrenewal of a homeowner’s insurance policy. 1 Insurance Company argues it was entitled to a directed verdict or to a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) for several different reasons; that the punitive damage award was excessive as a matter of law; and that it was entitled to a new trial because of flaws in the jury charge. We find the trial judge erred in denying the Insurance Company’s directed verdict motion and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Baynham v. State Highway Department of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
3Cited by18 opinions
- Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Jones v. LottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Ecclesiastes Production Ministries v. Outparcel Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Lucas v. RAWL FAMILY LTD. PARTNERSHIPSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Parrish v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.