Rubio Cañon Land & Water Ass'n v. Everett
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing-a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant was the owner of a tract of land in and through which, before he became such owner, plaintiff had laid an eight-inch pipe leading from the plaintiff’s well and pumping-plant, adjoining defendant’s land, to plaintiff’s reservoir, situated about a mile distant. The pipe was used by plaintiff to conduct water from its pump to said reservoir. Defendant, claiming that the pipe was maintained and used through his land without right, proceeded to tear up and remove thirty feet of the pipe and destroy eighty feet more by making holes therein. Thereupon plaintiff began this action to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Simmons v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Tucker v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1888
- Farmer v. Ukiah Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- McShane v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Henrici v. South Feather Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- City of Pasadena v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Conaway v. ToogoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Kytasty v. GodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Shonafelt v. BusathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.