City of Pasadena v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The court below sustained a demurrer to the complaint and thereupon gave judgment for the defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.
The object of the action was to recover taxes levied by the defendant for county purposes on certain property of the plaintiff situated outside of its corporate limits. The sole question presented for consideration is whether or not such property is subject to taxes for county purposes. The decision of the question depends on the meaning and effect of section 1, article XIII, of the constitution, as amended on November 3, 1914.
Prior to the adoption of this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. Doe G. 1,034California Supreme Court · 1868
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Miller v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Ferch v. Housing Authority of Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Bistline v. BassettIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Rock Creek Water District v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.