Fuhrman v. United America Insurors
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
This is a declaratory judgment action seeking to establish insurance coverage under a policy issued to a Minnesota resident by an Iowa insurance company registered to do business in Minnesota. The company is presently in receivership in Iowa. The district court held that it had jurisdiction to try the action despite the existence of an order of the Iowa receivership court purporting to enjoin all claimants from commencing actions against the company in any other court without first obtaining permission from the receiver. No permission had been given as to this action. We affirm.
O…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roche v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State ex rel. Bossung v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Calhoun v. LanauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Union Pacific Railroad v. RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Gainsburg v. Dodge, ChancellorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Seaway Port Authority of Duluth v. Midland Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Capo v. Century Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Marriage of Desjarlait v. DesjarlaitCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Hare v. Starr Commonwealth Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- A.P.I., Inc. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.