Legal Opinion

Hare v. Starr Commonwealth Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 2011No. Docket No. 291476PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJansen, J.

Plaintiff-garnishor, Charon Hare, personal representative of the estate of Marcel D. Hare, deceased, appeals by right the circuit court’s order denying her motion for summary disposition and granting summary disposition in favor of garnishee Frontier Insurance Company (Frontier) on the ground that a New York antisuit injunction was entitled to full faith and credit. We affirm, albeit for a different reason than that relied on by the circuit court.

i

This garnishment action arises out of the drowning death of plaintiffs decedent, Marcel D. Hare (Marcel), *210in the Kalamazoo River. Marcel had been…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arbor Farms, LLC v. Geostar Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Pecoraro v. Rostagno-WallatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Mlive Media Group v. City of Grand RapdisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Gaudreau v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Department of Transportation v. American Motorists InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API