Legal Opinion
Roche v. McDonald
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 3, 1928No. 38PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford
This writ of error is brought to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington which is challenged on the ground that the full faith and credit prescribed by § 1 of Art. IY of the Constitution .was not given to a judgment of a court of the. State of Oregon on which the.plaintiff in error relied. As this does not present a ground for the writ of error under § 237 (a) of the Judicial Codé, as amended by the Jurisdictional Act of 1925, 1 this writ is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. But since the papers show adequate reason for invoking a review by a petition for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Mills v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Hampton v. M'connelSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.