Legal Opinion
A.P.I., Inc. v. Home Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 31, 2010No. Civil 09-975 (JRT/JJG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part that motion.
BACKGROUND
From the 1940s to the 1970s, plaintiff A.P.I., Inc. (“API”) sold, distributed, and installed materials that contained asbestos. (Am. Compl. ¶ 2, Ex. 1, Docket No. 1.) In 1982, workers and other individuals who had suffered injuries from inhaling asbestos dust began asserting claims for asbestos-related injuries (the “asbestos-related claims”), and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Vicki Westcott, Administratrix of the Estate of Arden Westcott, Deceased v. City of Omaha, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Minnesota Pipe & Equipment Co. v. Ameron International Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- American Steamship Co. v. Hallett Dock Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- A.P.I., Inc. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Mitchell v. KurkowskiDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022