Legal Opinion
Seaway Port Authority of Duluth v. Midland Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 11, 1988No. C3-88-141PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
Respondent Seaway Port Authority of Duluth (SPAD) brought an action for declaratory judgment against respondents Midland and Reserve Insurance Companies and appellant Excess Insurance Company to determine which of the insurance companies was liable to pay SPAD’s costs in defending a number of lawsuits arising out of a bond default. The trial court declared all three insurance companies jointly and severably liable for all of SPAD’s losses, and ordered Midland and Reserve to pay SPAD’s costs and attorney fees in the declaratory judgment action. Excess Insurance argues on…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Interco Incorporated v. National Surety Corporation Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- O'Shaughnessy v. Smuckler Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Capella University, Inc. v. EXECUTIVE RISK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.