Legal Opinion

Thrifty Equipment Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 23, 1959No. 62985; protest 321212-K (A) (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest is described on the invoice as roller shells D.2, single flange or double flange. According to the record, it consists of parts of D.2 caterpillar tractors. It was assessed with duty at 13% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, the pertinent portions of which are as follows:

Paragraph 372, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52739, supra:

Machines, finished or unfinished, not specially…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Ducommun Hardware Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Richardson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. United States v. IrwinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. United States v. Lewis & CongerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. TAP Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Tap Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API