Legal Opinion

Tap Equipment Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 4, 1959No. 63560; protests 58/21186, etc. (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The protests listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The merchandise, the subject of these protests, consists of parts of D.2 and D.4 caterpillar tractors, as well as parts of a HD.5 Allis Chalmers tractor, which were classified under the provisions of paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, as “Parts of machinery, wholly or in chief value of metal, n.s.p.f.” Duty was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thrifty Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API