Rominger v. County of Colusa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBIE, J.
In this mandamus action under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, 1 § 21000 et seq.), plaintiffs Elaine and Gerald Rominger challenged a mitigated negative declaration approved by defendant Colusa County with respect to a subdivision proposed by real party in interest Adams Group Inc. The trial court denied the Romingers’ petition based on the conclusion that, notwithstanding the county’s approval of a mitigated negative declaration, the county’s “action in approving the subdivision map was not a project for CEQA purposes and [thus] no review…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sierra Club v. County of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Union of Med. Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. Bay Area Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.