Legal Opinion
Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. County of Santa Clara
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 7, 2015No. H039707PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
The County of Santa Clara and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Clara (collectively, the County) adopted a mitigated negative declaration and granted a use permit allowing real party in interest Candice Clark Wozniak, as trustee of the Candice Clark Wozniak Trust (the Trust), to host a limited number of weddings and other events on property located in the Santa Cruz Mountains (the Property). Appellant Keep Our Mountains Quiet (the Association), an unincorporated association of individuals who reside in the vicinity of the Property, successfully petitioned for a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Preserve Poway v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Clews Land & Livestock, LLC v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Aptos Council v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- East Sacramento Partnerships for a Livable City v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Investco Mgmt. & Dev. LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.