M & I BANK, FSB v. Coughlin
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The question posed is whether an Arizona statute, A.R.S. § 33-814(D), bars a lender’s action against third parties associated with a deed of trust loan transaction — that is, persons other than the borrower or others liable on the note — if the lender brings that action more than 90 days after the trustee’s sale disposing of the property securing the note.
Plaintiff M & I Bank alleges that it was tricked into funding a $285,300 real estate loan to Defendant Ty Coughlin. His annual income was represented as exceeding $360,000, when it was only…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Knappenberger v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Equity Income Partners, LP v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Morgan AZ Financial, L.L.C. v. GotsesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- LOL Finance Co. v. Easy Money Catfish Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2012
- Najah v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Equity Income Partners, Lp v. Chicago Title Insurance Comp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.