Legal Opinion
Chicago Insurance v. Manterola
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 19, 1998No. 1 CA-CV 97-0245PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARBARINO, Judge.
¶ 1 Chicago Insurance Company (Chicago) filed a declaratory action putting at issue its obligation to provide coverage for claims asserted against Dr. Dennis Elias and his wife by AnNette Manterola (Manterola), which arose out of the psychologisf/patient relationship. Manterola appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Chicago. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In March 1992, Dr. Elias, a psychologist, began treating Manterola for severe emotional problems. He eventually engaged in a sexual relationship with her. Dr. Elias was covered by a Chicago…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- American Home Assurance Co. v. CohenWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Estate of Hernandez v. FlavioArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- R.W. v. SchreinNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Northwest Youth ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Benjamin v. Gear Roller Hockey Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Legion Insurance v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Stonecreek Bldg. Co., Inc. v. ShureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.