Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Garrett Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1979No. Nos. 77-2403, 77-2404PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) brought this action against The Garrett Corporation (Garrett) for breach of contract. Garrett denied that it had breached the contract, and filed a counterclaim alleging that Westinghouse had wrongfully terminated the contract. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. After a non-jury trial on the merits, the district court found that both parties were equally responsible for the delays which led to Westinghouse’s decision to terminate the contract, and that therefore neither party should be allowed to recover for the other’s breach.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dynalectron Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Automotive Devices Co. v. Automotive Devices Co. Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Garrett Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1977
  4. General Metals, Inc. v. Green Fuel Economizer Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  5. Armour and Company v. ScottDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Hamilton Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Hubler Rentals, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. Efthimiou v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. LK Comstock & Co., Inc. v. Becon Const. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API