Legal Opinion
United States v. Hamilton Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 6, 1983No. Appeal 37-82PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COWEN,
Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the United States (Government or Navy) from a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals 1 (Board or ASBCA) in which the Board held that it had jurisdiction under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA) of the appellee’s (Hamilton or contractor) claim for reformation; that Hamilton’s con tract was improperly terminated for default; that the excess reprocurement costs which the Government claimed should be disallowed, and that the Government’s claim for the cost of military services furnished in the performance of the contract…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- W.M. Schlosser Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- W. H. Moseley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Micheal Chernick and Belle Chernick v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- James Giesler and Luke Coniglio (Doing Business as Central Park Company) v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Liebherr Crane Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- PHT Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Caddell Construction Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Conner Brothers Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.