Legal Opinion
Armour and Company v. Scott
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 10, 1972No. Civ. A. 68-1372PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEIS, District Judge.
I
The plaintiff and defendants entered into a contract on August 21, 1967 for the design and construction of a meat processing plant to be located in the City of Pittsburgh. Unlike most building agreements which require the preparation of all plans, drawings, and designs in advance, this was what is called in the trade a “design and build” contract. Its purpose is to allow construction to start while the final drawings and details are being prepared so that work on the detailed engineering plans can proceed during the time that preliminary construction is underway.
In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Compania Anonima Venezolana De Navegacion (Venezuelan Line) v. A. J. Perez Export Company, Etc., and Tyler Refrigeration CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Johnson v. Fenestra, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Automotive Devices Co. v. Automotive Devices Co. Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- General Metals, Inc. v. Green Fuel Economizer Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Armour and Company, a Corporation v. R. Stewart ScottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Aerospace and Electronic Systems Division, Defense and Electronic Systems Center v. The Garrett Corporation, Airesearch Manufacturing Company, a Division of the Garrett Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Aerospace and Electronic Systems Division, Defense and Electronic Systems Center v. The Garrett Corporation, Airesearch Manufacturing Company, a Division of the Garrett CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979