Legal Opinion
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Garrett Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 30, 1977No. Civ. 73-887-BPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action on a contract for the sale of goods brought by the buyer (Westinghouse) to recover the amount paid in excess of the contract price to procure the contract goods after the seller (Garrett) allegedly defaulted and consequently was terminated by the buyer. The seller counterclaims, charging that the termination was wrongful and that it may therefore recover its costs. By agreement of the parties the case was bifurcated for separate trials of liability and damages. The case has now been ably tried and briefed at length by counsel for both sides…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- The Len Company and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- General Motors Corp. v. Northrop Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Centex Construction v. ACSTAR InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- LK Comstock & Co., Inc. v. Becon Const. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.