Legal Opinion
Dynalectron Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 11, 1975No. 414-69PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
Dynalectron Corporation (Pacific Division) seeks review of the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), -69 — 1BCA ¶ 7595, affirming a default termination. This court earlier by order, 199 Ct. Cl. 996 (1972), refused to review the Board denial of excess reprocurement costs to the Government. We cited S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 406 U.S. 1 (1972). As frequently happens in this type of case, a recommended decision of Trial Judge Harkins has become the focal point of the parties’ adverse attention. However, under the law it is the Board decision we are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- United States v. Wegematic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Micheal Chernick and Belle Chernick v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- T. Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Federico Pena, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Olson Plumbing & Heating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Rixon Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Highland Construction Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Design & Production, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.