Legal Opinion

State v. Kunz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 1990No. C3-90-172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

The state appeals from a pre-trial order applying the physician-patient privilege to exclude evidence of intoxication in a DWI prosecution. We reverse.

FACTS

Respondent Robert Kunz was charged with two counts of misdemeanor DWI following a single-car accident which occurred on June 30, 1989, in St. Paul. Kunz, a St. Paul police officer, was driving an unmarked squad car. His blood alcohol level was tested only as an internal administrative measure, at police headquarters. Because of an earlier consent decree, that test could not be used in the criminal prosecution, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. State v. AndringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. GulleksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. King v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Secrest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  2. State v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Muller v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. PoetschkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API