State v. Staat
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of unlawful possession of narcotics in violation of Minn. St. 1969, §§ 618.01, 618.02, and 618.21. The dispositive issue raised is whether the trial court erred in ruling that the physician-patient, privilege created by Minn. St. 595.02(4) did not bar admission into evidence of two bottles of narcotic drugs discovered on defendant’s person when he was brought to the hospital in an unconscious and critical condition. We hold the ruling was not erroneous and affirm defendant’s conviction.
On the morning of June 6, 1967, a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pierson v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State v. BoehmeWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Hohenthal v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Swigerd v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Stempler v. SpeidellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Branch v. WilkinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- State v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In re National Hockey League Players' Concussion Injury LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.