Legal Opinion
Muller v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 25, 1995No. C7-95-1098, C2-95-1171PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Cecil Rogers, the defendant in a wrongful death action arising from a motor vehicle accident, seeks a writ of prohibition, for relief from an order permitting discovery into medical information Rogers provided to the Department of Public Safety. Patricia Muller, the plaintiff in the same action, seeks a writ of mandamus, to compel discovery into personal medical records on Rogers “from 1966 to the present” and medical records of treatment administered on the day of the accident. Both petitions involve the extent of medical privilege that may be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wenninger v. MuesingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Erickson v. MacArthurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. AndringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tat Man Chung v. Legacy Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Palm v. HolockerIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. PoetschkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- In re Daniel Cragg, Dalvin Cook v. Gracelyn Trimble, Daniel Cragg,...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
- Riley v. Woerner Agribusiness, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.