Legal Opinion

Secrest v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 31, 1996No. 503, 1994PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal of a conviction for second degree murder arising out of a motor vehicle collision where the central issue at trial was the identity of the driver, we hold that it was reversible error to admit into evidence, over objection asserting the physician-patient privilege, an admission to a treating emergency room physician by the defendant that he was the driver.

We also hold that the State violated Superior Court Criminal Rule 16 by failing promptly to disclose the substance of the opinions to be offered by its expert witness. In view of the reversal of the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Francis E. DevinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter LodgeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Weston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  4. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  5. Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API