Legal Opinion

State v. Gillespie

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 28, 2006No. A05-269PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

A jury found Gerald Gillespie guilty of terroristic threats, false imprisonment, and fifth-degree domestic assault following a trial in which Gillespie represented himself. The conviction was based on testimonial and medical evidence that Gillespie assaulted his wife. On appeal from the denial of his motion for a new trial, Gillespie challenges the jury-selection process, the admission of the victim’s medical records and the testimony of her treating physician, and the district court’s failure to advise him that he could stipulate to his prior convictions. Because we…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CarridineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In re National Hockey League Players' Concussion Injury LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  3. State v. DilboySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API