Utah State National Bank v. Smith
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
Appellant, claiming to be a bona fide purchaser for value of a negotiable promissory note, brought this action against the makers thereof "to enforce its payment. The defendants, asserting that the note was non-negotiable, interposed a defense valid against the payee therein. The court instructed the jury that the note was non-negotiable and that the defense, if established, would defeat recovery on the note. A verdict was rendered favorable to the defendants and judgment thereon entered. This is an appeal from the judgment. [1] The note in question was dated and payable in Utah, and its…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Union Trust Co. v. McGintyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- National Hardware Co. v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Merrill v. HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Meyer v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Charles Nelson Co. v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- McCornick & Co. v. Gem State Oil & Products Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Security Etc. Bk. v. Southern Etc. Bk.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Hutson v. RankinIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.