Legal Opinion

People v. Costello

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1943No. Crim. 4432PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

— The defendant has appealed from a judgment of conviction on a charge of grand theft, and from an order denying her motion for a new trial. She does not contend that the evidence on behalf of the prosecution, if believed by the jury, was not sufficient to support the verdict. The grounds of the appeal are that the court erred prejudicially in rulings on the admission of evidence and in giving a certain instruction on the defense of alibi.

The evidence in support of the verdict was substantially as follows: About 9:20 p.m. on May 12, 1941, the prosecuting-witness De Matei was walking toward…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. WintersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. Lee GamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. People v. LevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. TewksburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. CondleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API