Legal Opinion

People v. Tewksbury

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1976No. Crim. 18499PublishedCited by 185 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Gilbert Tewksbury was convicted by a jury of-first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187) and two counts of first degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). He contends on appeal from the ensuing judgment that his convictions were unlawful in that they are supported only by the uncorroborated testimony of two witnesses who were as a matter of law accomplices. He contends alternatively that the juiy was improperly instructed that he had the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that one of such witnesses was an accomplice. We conclude that neither of the foregoing nor…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by185 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API