Legal Opinion

People v. Roberts

California Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1898No. Crim. No. 164PublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County and from an order denying a new trial. F. A. Kelley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Defendants have been convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and appeal from the judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial. They introduced evidence tending to establish an alibi, and, as bearing upon this *378branch, of the case, the court gave the jury the following instruction: “You are instructed that if the defendant, or the defendants, was at some other place at the time it is alleged or proven that the crime was committed, it is what in law is called an alibi. When satisfactorily proven, it is a good defense in law. Whether or not an alibi was proven and established to your…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. People v. WintersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. Mar Gin SuieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. People v. SettlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API