Legal Opinion
People v. Condley
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 1977No. Crim. 7875PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRIS, J.
The defendants were convicted by a jury of escape from lawful custody. (Pen. Code, § 4532, subd. (b).) They appeal. Judgment affirmed.
Statement of the Case
Defendants, Boyd Gerald Condley and Allan Darrell Cummins, were indicted on charges of attempted escape from state prison (Pen. Code, § 4530, subd. (b)) and escape from lawful custody of the San Bernardino County Sheriff (Pen. Code, § 4532, subd. (b)).
Cummins was represented by counsel, and Condley represented himself. The defendants’ motion to sever the attempted escape from the escape charge was granted.
On March 30, 1976,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BlackwellWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Cesar Ramirez Gutierrez v. Bertram S. Griggs, Superintendent, California Institution for Men at ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.