Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of Roseville
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, P. J.
At the November 7, 2000, General Election, a majority of the voters of the City of Roseville (the City) voted to approve two conflicting tax measures. Measure Q proposed to ratify the City’s utility user’s tax and to restrict use of its revenues to certain specified purposes. Measure S proposed to repeal the City’s utility user’s tax.
In an action for declaratory relief brought by plaintiffs Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and Phil Ozenick, the trial court determined that Measure Q proposed a special tax requiring approval by two-thirds of the voters and that, because…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- CHIATELLO v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Neilson v. City of California CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Bay Area Cellular Telephone Co. v. City of Union CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency v. AmrheinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Borikas v. Alameda Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.