Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Escanaba Paper Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1934No. 24692 and 24734PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBevis, J.

The claimants in these cases can prevail on one ground only, that they are owners of the funds they claim, either in law or in equity. They cannot prevail as preferred creditors. They fall within none of the classes of creditors which the law prefers in the distribution of an insolvent’s assets, and must therefore fail if they occupy the position of creditors at all.

Were they owners? Did they continue to own the funds deposited by them in the trust department of the bank, or had title passed from them in exchange for the bank’s obligation to pay to them or to their designees equivalent sums?

Bo…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wasson v. LambIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. American Exchange National Bank v. GreggIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Old Colony Trust Co. v. Puritan Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Pittsburgh National Bank of Commerce v. McMurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Squire v. BrancifortiOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Squire v. American Express Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Squire, Supt. v. OxenreiterOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Union Properties, Inc. v. Baldwin Bros.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Guardian Trust Co. v. KirbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API