Legal Opinion

Dillon v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1927No. 20676PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

One of the assignments of error states that the judgment of the Court of Appeals is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and is contrary to law. This assignment of error might .well be disregarded on the ground that, this court does not' weigh the evidence or determine its sufficiency, but merely inquires whether there is any evidence tending to support the judgment. The only issue of fact tendered by the petition relates to the alleged shortcomings of the certificate of the city clerk; it being stated that the clerk had not determined…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The People Ex Rel. Jackson v. . PotterNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Newcomb v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. Socialist Party v. Uhl.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Graham v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Markus v. Trumbull County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Foster v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Stevens v. National City BankOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State ex rel. Save Your Courthouse Commt. v. Medina (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State Ex Rel. Strain v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API