Legal Opinion

Union Properties, Inc. v. Baldwin Bros.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1943No. 29307PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

The decision in this case depends upon whether there were sufficient available credits on the books of The Union Trust Company in favor of appellant when the Superintendent of Banks took charge to •offset completely appellant’s two notes. Stated differently : 'W as the superintendent required to credit the savings deposits standing in the name of appellant at the time he took charge or did he have the right to wait until the expiration of the. guaranty periods and the presentation of releases or waivers from the municipalities before crediting the various savings aceounts on the appellant’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Nashville Trust Co. v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hibert v. LangSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. McDonald, Admr. v. FultonOhio Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. The First National Bank of Clinton v. Vance Julian, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Roby C. Woody, D/B/A Woody Motor Company, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  2. Cissell v. First Nat. Bank of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
  3. Walter v. National City BankOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Homan v. Kemba Cincinnati Credit Union (In Re Homan)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  5. Appel v. Mainstar Oil Co. (In Re B & L Oil Co.)District Court, D. Colorado · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API