Legal Opinion

Squire v. American Express Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1936No. 25614 and 25615PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"Williams, J.

Under Ohio law there are certain generic differences that should be observed in analyzing the legal theories pertaining to claims for preference. In the instant cases there are three distinct classes, which are directly or indirectly involved in determining the legal rights of the parties; first, claims for preference based on alleged special deposits; second, those founded on alleged agency of the bank; and, third, those growing out of the trusteeship of a banking institution with a trust charter, in holding trust funds for distribution. This classifica tion is not necessarily…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jennings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. McDonald, Admr. v. FultonOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Fulton v. Escanaba Paper Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Squire, Supt. v. OxenreiterOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hammer v. TuffyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Union Properties, Inc. v. Baldwin Bros.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Merchants & Mechanics Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Cale v. American National BankCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1973
  5. Boss v. HardeeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API