Squire v. Branciforti
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
There is really just one question here, namely, do the facts pleaded by the Brancifortis in their petition establish a trust relationship between them and the Union Trust Company? If they do, then the Brancifortis are entitled to a preference and the answer does not state a defense. If they do not, there being nothing to indicate a bailment, then Brancifortis have failed on their petition, as the relation of debtor and creditor would necessarily exist between the bank and Brancifortis, and they would stand in the shoes of a general creditor.
We say there is no bailment here, as the specie was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cincinnati, Wilmington and Zanesville Railroad v. IliffOhio Supreme Court · 1862
- McDonald, Admr. v. FultonOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Fulton v. Escanaba Paper Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Wilson v. WoolvertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Glick v. GalierOhio Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hurst v. Enterprise Title Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Pippin v. Kern-Ward Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Saad v. RodriguezOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bell v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Johnson v. U.S. Title Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.