Legal Opinion

Hartwell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1986No. Appeals, 794 C.D. 1984, 795 C.D. 1984 and 796 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

These three workmens compensation appeals, consolidated for argument and decision because they all turn upon one question of law, involve claimants’ petitions for review questioning decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed the allowance of credit to the employer against the. employer’s workmen’s compensation obligations, for holiday pay received by each of the claimants. Generally stated, the question is:

Where each employee’s entitlement, to holiday pay is conditioned upon the worker having worked for a specified amount of time during the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Olivetti Corp. of AmericaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Steinle v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Murhon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Lightcap v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Cole v. Davol, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. Kelly v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API