Legal Opinion

Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1944No. Appeal, 121PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This claim was originally filed by E. E. Creighton, an employee of the defendant company, under the Occupational Disease Compensation Act of July 2, 1937, P. L. 2711, a supplement to the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The claimant having died after compensation for the entire amount payable to him, $3,600, had accrued, his widow, and only dependent, was substituted as claimant under the provisions of section 110 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, as amended in 1937, P. L. 1552, and has taken this appeal from the judgment of the court below, which sustained the decision of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chase v. Emery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Nesbit v. Vandervort & CurrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Tinsman v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Somerton v. the Bell Tele. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Hickey v. Cudahy Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Olivetti Corp. of AmericaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Steinle v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. SieglerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. NUS Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API