Legal Opinion
Murhon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 16, 1992No. 1048 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, Senior Judge.
Andrew Murhon (Murhon) petitions this court for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which granted Kawecki Berylco Industries, Inc. (employer) a credit for disability pension benefits paid to Murhon for the period from January 1, 1977 to March 20, 1981. We affirm.
The procedural history of this case has its genesis in the original claim petition filed by Murhon on January 25, 1977 pursuant to Section 108(a) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), 1 alleging total disability as a result of berylliosis, an occupational disease.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Sheehan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Hildebrand v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Hartwell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Toborkey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Township of Lower Merion v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.