Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Barbieri,
In this workmen’s compensation case we granted an appeal from the Superior Court’s action in affirming a lower court order ivhieh dismissed the employer *541and insurance carrier’s appeal from the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The Board had affirmed a referee’s order that appellants, Pennsylvania Department of Highways and State Workmen’s Insurance Fund, insurance carrier for the Pennsylvania Department of Highways, pay compensation for 50 per cent partial disability to the claimant, David L. Temple, appellee herein.
Although a question has been raised as to whether…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chase v. Emery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3Cited by47 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SantanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Ex Parte Dunlop Tire Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Humphrey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Olivetti Corp. of AmericaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Ex Parte Fort James Operating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.