Kelly v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice BAER.
US Airways Group, Inc. (Employer) appeals from the Commonwealth Court’s holding that Employer is not entitled to a credit against the workers’ compensation benefits paid to its employee, Gary Kelly, (Claimant), for the amount of the furlough allowance concurrently paid to Claimant, because the furlough allowance is not a “severance benefit” under Section 204(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), 77 P.S. § 71. After careful consideration, we agree with the Commonwealth Court that a furlough allowance is not a severance benefit, and, therefore, affirm its conclusion…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Bowser v. BlomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Schriver v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. CleggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Kolar v. Preferred Unlimited Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2010