Legal Opinion

Wilde v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1981No. 16916PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Subsequent to receiving benefits from their no-fault insurer and obtaining a judgment against a third-party tortfeasor, plaintiffs brought this action against their no-fault insurer seeking additional no-fault insurance benefits in the amount of $6,543.50. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurer and dismissed plaintiffs’ action. Plaintiffs appeal that dismissal.

Carrielee Wilde was insured under her husband’s no-fault automobile insurance policy by Mid-Century. On March 24, 1978, she was injured in an automobile accident. Mid-Century paid…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Paul v. KirkendallUtah Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Penrod v. Nu Creation Creme, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hill v. Seattle First National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co. v. WallUtah Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API