Wilde v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
Subsequent to receiving benefits from their no-fault insurer and obtaining a judgment against a third-party tortfeasor, plaintiffs brought this action against their no-fault insurer seeking additional no-fault insurance benefits in the amount of $6,543.50. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurer and dismissed plaintiffs’ action. Plaintiffs appeal that dismissal.
Carrielee Wilde was insured under her husband’s no-fault automobile insurance policy by Mid-Century. On March 24, 1978, she was injured in an automobile accident. Mid-Century paid…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Paul v. KirkendallUtah Supreme Court · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Penrod v. Nu Creation Creme, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
- Hill v. Seattle First National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Bear River Mutual Insurance Co. v. WallUtah Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.